JLB Chats w/ Dave J + Rollo (12-Apr-2018)

Is it okay to hold and share ‘crazy’ opinions? Is it possible that the politicians on our telescreens are literally actors (who sometimes even play more than one role at a time)? Is the moon anything more than a light? Why do so few people either know about or discuss the War Hoax and/or History Hoax?

On Wednesday, 11-Apr-2018, I made another appearance in the Fakeologist audiochat Discord server. I was joined by controversial YoutTube personality Dave J, and Fakeologist’s resident lunatic Crazy Rollo, to discuss a range of topics spanning the entire spectrum of alternative thought (and beyond).

This podcast features that discussion (unedited) along with introductory and closing thoughts recorded 12-Apr-2018.

Full call on Fakeologist (includes about half an hour of Rollo + Dave J before I got there): here.

Chaser’s War on Stan Zemanek (and others): here.

3 thoughts on “JLB Chats w/ Dave J + Rollo (12-Apr-2018)

  • 13-April-2018 at 6:05 pm

    DaveJ has been churning out some of the most hilarious troofer drama comedy gold for the last 2 weeks while managing at the same time to be one of the few original and creative thinkers in the fakeologist roster. “Crazy” usually goes with that “thinking out of the box” territory. Why John Adams couldn’t just laugh off the label of “spiritual murderer” (lol) with a grain of salt, the way Gaia did the week before, and keep his friendly relations with Abirato and the fakeologist site is anybody’s guess. But it doesn’t surprise me that he wanted DaveJ banned. DaveJ pre-empted his confusion-&-doubt-spreading shill operation over there before it could start! lol

    • 14-April-2018 at 9:52 am

      You should see Dave J on the Fakeologist Discord server. Trolling the nuffies like nobodies business. By nuffies, I mean the sad-sacks there who seem to live for petty conflict. Dave is giving them exactly what they want — and they do not like it!

      Dave is showing me that I have been too polite to certain people for far too long. When you are dealing with a misbehaving pooch, do you try to talk sense to it? No. You give it a clip, maybe even rub its face in its own poo to make it realise that it has pooed in the wrong place. For too long I have been trying to reason with creatures who have more in common with pooches than they do with considerate, thinking people like myself. This may seem harsh, it may even seem unfair, but it is the truth of the matter.

      Not all 'humans' are the same. Some are good by nature. Some are not.

      Take how Dave handled Gaia a few weeks ago in the livestream. Took about two minutes to size up Gaia and call him out for the obstructionist and obfuscationist he is. I had been wasting hours of time trying to reason with 'figure eights' like Gaia and Phil, whereas Dave just bulldozed them from day dot and hasn't looked back since. I took a lot out of that.

      As for John Adams, I don't believe in 'paid shills', but if I did, then I would be very suspicious of JA's conduct. Then again, if I believed in 'paid shills', I would be very suspicious of most peoples conduct. This is one of the reasons why I am thankful that I was able to ascend beyond belief in 'paid shills'. It adds a load to the engine of the mind, like a faulty air conditioning unit in an old car. The engine has enough work to do as it is, why add more strain?

      Anyway it is good to hear from you again, Negentropic. Hope you are well. WordPress tells me that this is your 117th comment on the site. I personally consider this one of the luckiest numbers in existence. Numbers everywhere…

      • 14-April-2018 at 10:19 am

        Dave J may enjoy instigating with the people at fakeologist, but it isn’t particularly enjoyable to listen to, in my opinion.
        Gaia is an easy target, and as annoying as he can be, listening to Dave J berate him for daring to say that “he (Gaia) can’t know anything” isn’t great audio. I think I understood what Gaia was trying to say in that instance, and it was particularly annoying to hear Dave J repeatedly throw that comment back at him in his bullying fashion.

        All that said, I think 90% of the folks at Fakeologist are not worth the time and effort, which is why I don’t bother commenting there anymore. I lost all respect for Faye when she attacked Mark Tokarski, and then didn’t have the backbone to even comment on the picture he posted of himself with Miles Mathis.

        I haven’t followed the John Adams situation, and so, have no opinion on it.
        My impression of him vs the rest of the fakeologist crowd is that I’ve tended to respect Adams more than most. He listens to those he speaks with, at least, and is capable of responding without misdirecting. I enjoyed the chat that JLB had with him a couple of weeks ago a lot more than anything with Rollo or Dave J.

Leave a Reply