JLB Chats w/ Yossarion + Farcevalue (22-Dec-2017)

Are the people who run the show ‘evil’? Do ‘paid shills’ really exist? What evidence is there to prove it? How much responsibility ought we take for our own lives? Is the system as bad as some people believe and, if so, why do we continue to play our roles in the system?

On Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 I made another appearance in the Fakeologist audichat Discord server. I was accompanied first by Yossarion from Queensland, Australia, and later by Farcevalue from the United States.

This podcast features that discussion (unedited, save for some sound level adjustments) along with introductory and closing thoughts recorded on Friday, 22-Dec-2017.

Music track: ‘Chill Wave’ by Kevin MacLeod of incompetech.com

15 thoughts on “JLB Chats w/ Yossarion + Farcevalue (22-Dec-2017)

  • 24-December-2017 at 10:08 am
    Permalink

    So much of the debate that surrounds the content of your discussions seem to hinge on the “They” factor.

    When you talk of the “system” and those that administer it without putting a face to the participants, it is always going to be a tough task to make the type of judgment you task us to propose ….. that is, of if the shadow is good or evil.

    When you start to ask the ” how much do you live in your self-sovereignty” questions you posed, these can be couched in a different vernacular that makes it possible to address a good/opportunity or bad/evil outcome based on your choices.

    From the very simplest examples of manipulation of herd mentality that we are going through at the time of writing this comment ……… “Christmas”………….. we can see the many facets of the corporate involvement and the distortion in the cultural narrative.

    If you have any semblance of awareness to the absence of critical thinking in the population at large at these times, the question would have to loom large as to where is your need to blame “them”.

    This is when your own self-sovereignty is called into question through what participation you have in the Christmas narrative or any of the other multitude of “system” derived activities. Regards Russell

    • 26-December-2017 at 12:35 pm
      Permalink

      “So much of the debate that surrounds the content of your discussions seem to hinge on the “They” factor.”

      I was glad we were able to spend some time addressing this topic in our most recent Member Skype call.

      For the sake of posterity I still think it is worth briefly replying here as well.

      Put simply, I don’t know who is at the top of the broader social structure today. I don’t expect to ever know. And I am at peace with this. It is not a problem for me.

      What I can know is what the authority is putting out there for the masses to believe, regardless of who is at the top of the organisations which comprise the overarching authority.

      By ‘authority’ I mean the people who run the show, the storytellers, the people who keep the masses in line via (among other things) telling them incredible stories about all manner of things.

      Space exploration, war (including millions of deaths), nuclear bombs, inter-continental ballistic missiles, ancient history, human evolution, spinning ball earth, on and on and on.

      The authority i.e. the author of the stories for the masses, and the people at the top of the social structure, there is a conceptual overlap between these two groups.

      Many of us partake in the system of storytelling. When a father reads a book about space exploration to his children, he is helping to spread and reinforce the story.

      But he is not, of course, anywhere near the top of the broader social structure.

      The lecturer of astrophysics at the university is also a key member of the authority, the storytelling, but is he really anywhere near the top of the broader social structure? I doubt it.

      This is why I like to focus on what we do know, what we can agree on, and then draw conclusions from this. For instance, we can all agree that the masses were told the lunar module took men to the moon.

      Then some of us can agree that it looks like a comical school project, complete with cardboard panels, aluminium foil drapings, and even some sticky tape for good measure. A joke.

      From here we can discuss why it looks like this. Why did the authority — whoever they are — release such bogus evidence to support their silly story?

      I have put forward what I think is the most sensible explanation, but I am more than open to other explanations as well.

      In the meantime, getting bogged down on ‘who are they’ is at best a distraction from the topic at hand, and at worst a complete waste of one’s finite time/energy.

      We can draw logical and even firm conclusions from the evidence available on some discrete topics.

      As for who ‘they’ are, how much evidence do we really have to draw conclusions from? As far as I can see, the answer is not much.

  • 25-December-2017 at 4:44 am
    Permalink

    Interesting discussion. I agree with you on the point they make it obvious that there is something fishy going on but they do it because they are Kabbalists which means they believe in Karma and Free will. They have to present you with the truth and “We” as a herd then have to choose between the truth and the lie and we consistently choose the lie which then inflicts pain on us.

    As William Cooper would put it “A nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such people are steaks on the table and beasts of burden by choice and consent. ”

    But if you can begin to see through the veil and think for yourself you will be rewarded with navigating through this realm with relative ease. This realm has a purpose and it is my disappointment that they have succeeded separating you from your Creator. Place as much critical thought into how you got here as you do on how we are being manipulated and I guarantee you will eat of its fruits.

    Not sure if you have seen this discussion but here is one from Above top secret that answers some of these questions. http://www.illuminati-news.com/00363.html. Also look up the Law of Confusion. May you be reunited with the knowledge of love and light of the Infinite Creator.

    • 26-December-2017 at 12:19 pm
      Permalink

      “…they do it because they are Kabbalists which means they believe in Karma and Free will.”

      What is the best piece of evidence you have to support this assertion?

      • 26-December-2017 at 1:12 pm
        Permalink

        Hi JLB … The reason we know the powers that be are Kabbalist is the symbolism they hide in plain site. On the money, during their rituals (911 for example was a human sacrifice) in the Numerology of the events. These are examples of ancient sorcery that most people today would laugh at, but thats exactly how they would like to keep it. The Masons are just keepers of ancient knowledge and if you look deeper into it it all stems from Egypt and before that Atlantis. The Kabbalah was hijacked from the Egyptians thats why you see the Obelix in the three pillars of power Washington DC (Military) Vatican (Religion) and City of London(Finance) (Note all these cities are separate from any country) and Pyramids on the US Dollar.

        A concrete example would be 911 itself. Before the towers fell there was Tower 1(Male with he antenna) and Tower 2(Female). These two towers represent the two pillars at the gate of the Temple of Solomon (Solar Moon) Boaz and Jachin which are represented on the Kabbalistic tree of life. The number 11 itself represents the Twin(Pillars)/Duality the idea the two are separate. This idea is echoed in most Masonic lodges with the two pillars at the entrance. The idea is to have them mate to and “give birth” to the third (eye)/trinity. You have to “tear” down your old self and be reborn/rebuild anew. Thats why they built the Freedom tower which looks like/is the Seal of Solomon the fusion of the two extremes the Shaft (Pointing up Triangle) and the Chastity (Pointing down Triangle) which is a very old symbol much older than Judaism. Watch this Mark Passio video if you want a through comb through https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXOJHZhoO68

        As far as Karma this is an old idea from all ancient cultures just read it from the Kabalyon if you need reference. The idea is that you can absolve your Karma if allow certain conditions. By making us make the choice it absolves them from making the choice for us. We should be able to see we are being fooled and enslaved but if we make the choice then we are the ones responsible as you were mentioning before.

        • 26-December-2017 at 1:29 pm
          Permalink

          Thanks for taking the time to reply. I asked you for your best piece of evidence that the people at the top are kabbalists, and I cannot discern what you are presenting as that best piece of evidence.

          Let me ask again: what is the single best piece of evidence you have to support your assertion that the people at the top are kabbalists?

          You speak about what things ‘represent’. Represent to who? Each of us as individuals gets to decide what any particular symbol represents to us.

          For example, the number 33 represents boogeyman to most conspiratards. It represents nothing more than thirty three (i.e. the equivalent of 3 multiplied by 11) to normies.

          To me 33 represents (among other things; it is all contextual) an easy way to have fun with my thumbnails and videos, taking the piss out of conspiratards.

          There is even a subtle 33 on the main page of this very website.

          In other words, I get to decide what 33 represents to me, just like you get to decide what 33 represents to you.

          If you are going to claim that you know what any particular symbol represents to somebody else, the least you can do is provide a source to verify this claim.

          • 26-December-2017 at 1:59 pm
            Permalink

            Hi JLB … Again you have fallen for the idea that nothing has meaning. This is how we get ourselves into debates about 54 genders.

            There is only one meaning that matters just like there is only one truth. 33 means something very particular. To the profane it could mean anything but to the initiated there is agreement its meaning. 33 means something deep and profound and the fact that the most used instrument of transaction is littered with these symbols it should suggest it has meaning. Our rulers are not stupid. I cannot tell you the meaning because it would mean nothing unless you took the time to discover it for yourself. Its its own language that has been kept away from you and will take time to understand. There is no easy way to learn this stuff accept begin the journey by taking the first step. All I can do is suggest a path.

            Just for completeness all 33rd degree Masons have agreement on what it means. The rest of the profane who have not even spent 10 minutes to try understand it will have 10000 different ideas but you should not care about them. Take the time to try it and you will see crevice in you mind begin to open. This is what a symbol is designed to do.

          • 26-December-2017 at 2:08 pm
            Permalink

            I asked you a simple question about your evidence, and your first line in response is to make accusations against me what I have supposedly ‘fallen for’.

            I will ask you one more time: what is your best piece of evidence to support the claim that the people who run the show are kabbalists?

            Do not bother responding unless your response focuses on your evidence. You will not be given a fourth chance.

            Once we have established what your evidence is (if anything) then we can inspect it and explore your claims.

            Then we can move on to your accusations against me.

            First things first.

  • 26-December-2017 at 2:31 pm
    Permalink

    Hi JLB … I mentioned it 3 times that they Hide it in Plain Site. They have Monuments to their beliefs i.e The Freedom Tower, The Dollar Bill I dont know how else to say it. These are ancient motifs used by Kabbalists/Masons that have particular meaning. There is no dictionary of what they mean. Doesnt work like that so if you want a dictionary I cannot provide it. It doesnt exist.

    • 26-December-2017 at 2:39 pm
      Permalink

      Okay, so you have no actual evidence to support your claim. That is all well and good but it seems to me you may have somehow found yourself on the wrong website.

      Please read and seriously consider this article: https://www.johnlebon.com/articles/primary-source-research-methodology/

      If you want to spout grandiose, sweeping speculations as ‘truth’, and also respond with ad hominems when challenged for evidence, this is not the place for you.

      Consider this a polite, final warning.

      • 28-December-2017 at 1:10 am
        Permalink

        Hi JLB, I read through your report carefully. All I have to say is that somethings fall outside of your method of decrement, like is Beethoven better than Bach. Somethings cannot be quantified and proven to your degree of completeness. This is where the esoteric discipline lies. So i take this junction to agree to disagree and good luck on your quest for truth.

          • 28-December-2017 at 6:19 am
            Permalink

            suri,

            JLB spoke about “My Inventions” in his podcast about Tesla.
            Apparently you haven’t listened to it, but he goes into great detail about his research into Tesla.
            https://www.johnlebon.com/key-topics/nikola-tesla-mythology/

            The part about My Inventions is toward the end, and the 1hour 35minute mark, but I’d suggest listening to the entire podcast to get the full context. It is quite interesting.

          • 28-December-2017 at 9:00 am
            Permalink

            As bmseattle has politely and rightly pointed out to you, I have already covered ‘My Inventions’. All of the relevant information (including sources) is provided in that podcast. The key point is that ‘My Inventions’ was not written by Tesla as a book, but as a series of articles which were published in a magazine run by a science-fiction writer (and alleged crook) named Hugo Gernsback.

            Allow me to you suggest that you familiarise yourself with the research on this website before posting any further comments. Cheers.

Leave a Reply